The creativity con

This, which is longer than what I usually link, is by Thomas Frank.

The faiths and hopes of the postwar middle-class society have mostly evaporated today. Our parents’ beliefs in consensus and the goodness of American civilization have joined mainline Protestantism and the benevolent corporation on some nostalgia channel of discarded ideas. One signature ideal of that era has survived, however. Indeed, it thrives; it glows with an incandescence that time cannot dim. I am referring to our ongoing fascination with creativity, the human power that our affluent-society ancestors liked to believe made life worth living and that was, at the same time, responsible for the forward motion of civilization itself…

The long-running appeal of creativity to middle-class Americans is easy to understand: it is an explanation for progress that seems to put them in history’s starring role. The reason our country is so successful, it assures us, is the day-to-day innovativeness of millions of ordinary but ingenious people. But the actual, real-world effects of creativity have been anything but healthy for the middle-class society. At every step in the long march to our current state of crushing plutocratic inequality, creativity’s holy name was invoked. The big tax cuts of the 1970s and ’80s were done in order to reinvigorate our creativity. Our leaders deregulated banks, did endless favors for tech and pharma, allowed deindustrialization to rust out the heartland, and ushered us generally into a “postindustrial” era in which working people lost their claim on middle-class prosperity — all in order to augment our powers of creativity and innovation. - Jacobin