Friday, July 12, 2019

An important step backward for Line 3, if we're lucky

Hopefully, what with one thing and another, the whole plan will plunge into a bottomless pit.
Minnesota regulators announced (July 3) that they will revisit their environmental review of the Line 3 pipeline project, rather than asking the state Supreme Court to take up the case.
Last June, the state Public Utilities Commission approved Enbridge Energy's $2.6 billion plan to replace its aging Line 3 oil pipeline across northern Minnesota.
But early last month, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed the PUC's approval of the project's environmental impact statement — a review of potential impacts the pipeline might have on the surrounding environment — saying it didn't adequately address the potential impact of a spill in the Lake Superior watershed. - MPR
Also: "'Protesters as terrorists': growing number of states turn anti-pipeline activism into a crime" - The Guardian

1 comment:

  1. On an unrelated matter, did you see that Emmer and Stauber are pushing for an investigation into the "Obama administration scandal-plagued land grab" ... Klobuchar emails cited ... and that Twin Metals would have created 17,000 jobs.

    https://republicans-naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/nr_cox_letter_final.pdf

    ReplyDelete